BHS logo Welcome to the Bahamas Historical Society
Home
Publications

Vol. 1/1979
Vol. 2/1980
Vol. 3/1981
Vol. 4/1982
Vol. 5/1983
Vol. 6/1984
Vol. 7/1985
Vol. 8/1986
Vol. 9/1987
Vol. 10/1988
Vol. 11/1989
Vol. 12/1990
Vol. 13/1991
Vol. 14/1992
Vol. 15/1993
Vol. 16/1994
Vol. 17/1995
Vol. 18/1996
Vol. 19/1997
Vol. 20/1998
Vol. 21/1999
Vol. 22/2000
Vol. 23/2001
Vol. 24/2002
Vol. 25/2003
Vol. 26/2004
Vol. 27/2005
Vol. 28/2006
Vol. 29/2007
Vol. 30/2008
Vol. 31/2009
Vol. 32/2010
Vol. 33/2011
Vol. 34/2012
Vol. 35/2013
Vol. 36/2014
Vol. 37/2015

News & Events
People
Museum
Library
Research Aids
Membership
Contact
Show Your Support

Journal of the Bahamas Historical Society, Volume 5 (October 1983)

THE LOYALISTS AND THEIR SETTLEMENTS
by Patrice Williams

During the American Revolutionary War, 1775-1782, two parties fought valiantly against each other, hoping to achieve various goals. One of the parties was called Patriots or Rebels while the other was referred to as Royalists, Loyalists or Tories. For the Patriots the ultimate goal of the war was independence, for the Loyalists re-instatement of British rule.

At the onset of the war the British Government believed that the majority of Americans were loyal to England. It was said that "two thirds of the people were on the British side only awaiting the presence of the British army to rise up against the tyranny of the Continential Congress."1 In actual fact, however, only one third of the American population was loyal to the British Crown.2 This group was composed of many well-to-do Americans, such as lawyers, doctors, clergymen, government officials, merchants and land owners.3 These people were reluctant to involve their persons and their property in the turbulent quest for independence. Of these Americans some rightly deserved the name of Loyalists as their hatred for the leaders of the Revolution in the South eclipsed the fear of tyranny from overseas.4 Their hatred stemmed from continuous mistreatment and ill use. It is small wonder, therefore, that they looked to the Mother Country, which had treated them favourably, for relief against the unfair system of representation by which they were taxed without consent and against the judicial system which denied them access to the courts.5 "For these Loyalists, tryanny began at home."6

Compare these people to others who bore the name "Loyalists" but practised a certain type of neutrality. Of these, John C. Miller in his book Triumph of Freedom said, "In Revolution many seek only to survive: safety rather than glory is the greatest good."7 And so, during the war of American Independence thousands were contented to take comfortable seats on the side lines, cheer both sides and be the first to congratulate the winner. By passing as a Loyalist with the British and as a Patriot with the Americans one hoped to possess "doubled-barrelled insurance"8 against molestation or loss of property. Once their duplicity was revealed these people were branded by both sides as traitors.

...

If you are interested in the full text of the article, you may order this issue of our Journal for B$5.00 plus s&h by contacting the society.

END NOTES

  1. John C. Miller, Triumph of Freedom, United States 1948, pp 54-59.
  2. Ibid. Also see The Spirit of Seventy-Six: The Story Of The Revolution as told by Participants. Edited by Henty Steele Commager and Richard B. Morris, New York, 1967.
  3. John C. Miller, Triumph of Freedom, United States 1948, pp 54-59.
  4. Ibid.
  5. Ibid.
  6. Ibid.
  7. Ibid.
  8. Ibid.